Court of Appeals Rejects Challenge to AMA Guides, Consideration of Chronic Pain, Affirms Decision Denying Claimant Benefits
In Millanes-Ortiz v. Loyd Roling Construction , No. 19-2077 (Iowa App. Jan. 21, 2021), the agency and district court denied benefits to claimant, finding that claimant suffered no permanent impairment from a fall that occurred in the course of his employment. On appeal, claimant argues that the commissioner erred as a matter of law in considering only the AMA Guides to determine permanency. Claimant also alleges that the agency erred in applying law to fact by failing to consider chronic pain as sufficient evidence of a change in physiological capacity in a scheduled member case. Finally, claimant argues that the decision to deny permanent disability is not supported by substantial evidence. Claimant had a stipulated work injury and argued that he was entitled to permanency because of chronic pain and changes sustained in his left arm. He argued that the commissioner erred by not considering any evidence beyond the AMA Guidelines when determining the extent...